Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Cold Fusion #1 Claims NASA Chief

Source: PESN (Pure Energy Systems Network)
Date: May 31, 2011
by: Hank Mills

A Chief NASA scientist, Dennis Bushnell has came out in support of Andrea Rossi's E-Cat technology, but denies any type of nuclear fusion is taking place, saying it is probably beta decay per the Widom Larson Theory. Repackaging the terminology to avoid embarrassment will not erase over twenty years of suppression and the reality of cold fusion!
Dennis Bushnell is a Chief scientist at NASA Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia. He is also an inventor, author, and has been a consultant to countless government and military agencies. A few of these include the DOD, Air Force, DARPA, and the NRC. To read a more complete summary of his background, a good review can be found here. Recently, he was interviewed during an EV World podcast.


Dennis Bushnell; Source: NASA
During the show, he addressed what he called "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions" as being the most interesting and promising alternative energy technology being developed. In fact, it was first on his list, ahead of salt water agriculture, cyanobacteria, energy conservation, geothermal power, nano-plastic solar panels, solar thermal concentrators, and high altitude wind power. 
"The most interesting and promising [technology sector] at this point ... [is] low energy nuclear reactions."
Bushnell went on to say that LENR technology could potentially solve all of our energy and climate problems. He stated the technology could be used for any application, including to power rockets for space travel. It is quite refreshing to hear such positive statements, in support of cold fusion, from a mainstream, credible, and respected scientist!

Actually, I cannot think of any other scientist off the top of my head, that I would have rather made a statement in support of LENR (cold fusion). His extensive scientific background, career history, and status as a Chief NASA scientist make his supportive statements very significant. Hopefully, they will inspire other scientists to take LENR research seriously! I would like to hear a naysayer like Bob Park (who has attacked cold fusion researchers for 20 years) try to criticize him for his comments.

During the interview, Bushnell specifically mentioned Andrea Rossi's E-Cat (Energy Catalyzer) technology, and seemed very supportive of it. He reviewed the tests that have been performed and the large amount of excess heat produced. At one point he made a remark scientists across the world should notice...

"I think we are almost over the "we do not understand it" problem. I think we are almost over the "this does not produce anything useful" problem. I think this will go forward fairly rapidly now. If it does, this is capable of, by itself, completely changing geo-economics, geo-politics, and solving climate issues."

Despite his positive statements about LENR, he also made a few statements that indicate his lack of ability to admit that nuclear fusion at low temperatures could be a reality. He stated that all of the so called, "cold fusion" experiments performed over the last twenty years did not produce fusion reactions. His position is that they produced energy via a process called "Widom Larsen" theory, that does not involve fusion at all, but only "beta decay."
...
Read full article here

7 comments:

  1. Here is a partial transcript of the NASA scientist (Dennis Bushnell) interview:

    http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/06/01/nasas-bushnell-lenr-most-promising-energy-alternative-and-its-not-fusion/

    Here is the EVWorld podcast interview part 1:
    http://evworld.com/article.cfm?storyid=1983

    Here is part 2:
    http://evworld.com/article.cfm?storyid=1985

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bearish Trader: You have posted this article - do you have any view about the potential impact on markets if the LENr becomes commercial?

    ReplyDelete
  3. For those of us who have been following LENR closely, we already know it is legitimate. The mainstream scientific community and public can not accept it or do not really know about recent developments in cold fusion yet. I expect oil/natural gas to rise until then, when there should be some sort of disruption (e.g. temporary panic selling). Some sort of equilibrium should be reached when people realize cold fusion only has a few companies behind it and it will take years to ramp up production. The cold fusion 1 MW power plant in Xanthi, Greece is scheduled for October, 2011.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nice to see a few people with their eyes open, as all main line science, the media and governments are still in calculated denial.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Update on when Xanthi, Greece 1 MW cold fusion plant will come on-line Rossi said last week of October, 2011. Here is the article:

    http://www.e-catworld.com/2011/06/06/daily-digest-of-rossi-quotes-june-5th-1mw-e-cat-plant-to-be-unveiled-last-week-of-october/

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have a Physics background and have been following this closely. I and am quite excited by this seemingly reproducible and sustainable e-cat. It could change the world.
    With such little Nickel used it would seem to not have a material impact on Ni supplies. However, has there been thought given to how to profit from this knowledge? Buy Nickel commodity? Futures?
    Would love to hear comments.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The timing of such things is always tricky even though you know in a macro sense, cold fusion will be very huge and worth trillions. Going long nickel or shorting oil do seem like valid ideas, but market timing is difficult. The public perception and acceptance of cold fusion as a valid game changing technology is not really to the point where prices will be driven by the new technology (yet), especially since the first time cold fusion was announced it was so severely discredited by the likes of M.I.T. etc. The elitist insiders would be the exception. They are probably positioned already or prepared somehow to take advantage or to protect their investments in the old energy technology.

    ReplyDelete

ShareThis